Latest Forum Topics /
OCBC Bank
Last:16.6
+0.22
|
 Post Reply
|
|
will UOB recover from the low valuation crisis ?
|
|||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
01-Apr-2025 10:01
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
If you were in Singapore during the 1998 Asian Financial Crisis, tightening your belt would have meant cutting discretionary spending, managing debt wisely, and focusing on financial resilience. The same principles apply if a similar crisis hits in 2026.
How to Tighten Your Belt During a Severe Financial Crisis (Based on 1998 Experience) 1. Manage Cash Flow Aggressively ✅ Reduce Discretionary Spending ? Cut back on non-essential expenses like overseas travel, dining out, and luxury goods. ✅ Prioritize Essentials ? Focus on housing, food, transport, and healthcare. ✅ Increase Emergency Cash Reserves ? Keep at least 12-18 months of expenses in liquid assets (SGD deposits, T-bills). 2. Avoid High-Interest Debt ✅ Pay Down Expensive Debt ? Credit card debt (typically 20%+ interest) is dangerous in a crisis. ✅ Avoid Overleveraging on Property ? In 1998, many who overborrowed on housing faced negative equity when prices fell. ✅ Refinance Loans Early ? Lock in lower interest rates before a crisis worsens. 3. Preserve & Grow Your Income ✅ Job Security Matters ? In 1998, layoffs were common. Stick with financially stable companies and upskill for job security. ✅ Diversify Income Streams ? Side hustles, dividends, rental income, or gig work can act as a buffer. ✅ Avoid Job-Hopping ? During crises, new hires are often the first to be laid off. 4. Be Opportunistic with Investments ✅ Don?t Panic Sell ? In 1998, many sold stocks at the bottom, only to see prices recover in the 2000s. ✅ Buy Strong Assets Cheaply ? If Singapore banks drop to 0.8x P/B or higher dividend yields (>6.5%), consider accumulating. ✅ Focus on Cash-Rich, Low-Debt Companies ? Like how OCBC, UOB, and DBS survived 1998 better than highly leveraged firms. 5. Take Advantage of Government Support ✅ Monitor CPF Changes ? During past crises, CPF rules were adjusted. Be aware of possible contribution rate changes. ✅ Use Subsidies or Relief Measures ? The government might roll out utility rebates, tax relief, or retraining grants. --- What Would Have Been the Best Moves in 1998? ✔ Holding cash & buying assets at rock-bottom prices (e.g., OCBC?s P/B was near 0.5x in 1998). ✔ Keeping a stable job instead of job-hopping. ✔ Avoiding overleveraging in property & debt. Would you follow a similar strategy in 2026, or would you adjust based on new risks like digital banking and geopolitical uncertainty? |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
01-Apr-2025 09:56
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
If all Asian economies collapse after 2025 in a more severe financial crisis?worse than 1998?Singapore?s young ministers will face a baptism by fire. Unlike past crises, where digitalization and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) could be economic buffers, this collapse would demand old-school crisis management: strong fiscal policy, capital controls, and interest rate maneuvers.
--- How Will Singapore?s Young Ministers Respond? 1. Lawrence Wong (PM) ? Crisis Management or Hesitation? Background: Finance Minister turned PM, but lacks crisis experience like Lee Kuan Yew or Goh Chok Tong. Challenge: If DBS, UOB, and OCBC face rising bad loans from ASEAN exposure, Wong must act fast to prevent a bank liquidity squeeze. Possible Move: Use MAS to inject liquidity, cut taxes, or roll out bank guarantees to prevent panic withdrawals. 2. Gan Kim Yong (DPM) ? Business & Trade Reaction? Background: Experienced but not tested in a financial crisis of this scale. Challenge: If major trading partners (China, U.S., EU) slow down, Singapore?s trade-dependent economy shrinks sharply. Possible Move: Fast-tracked trade agreements with India, Middle East, and Africa to diversify Singapore?s dependence on ASEAN and China. 3. Heng Swee Keat (SM) ? Can He Handle Another Crisis? Background: Handled COVID-19 stimulus well, but withdrew from PM race due to health issues. Challenge: If foreign capital flees Singapore, how to reassure investors while maintaining strong reserves? Possible Move: Tap into Singapore?s reserves (like in COVID-19) for direct stimulus, but ensure Temasek/GIC don?t dump too many assets at a loss. 4. Tharman (Now Singapore President) ? Silent Observer or Behind-the-Scenes Guide? Background: Best macroeconomic thinker in Singapore?s leadership in recent years. Challenge: Does not control economic policy, but his insights could shape MAS and the cabinet?s decisions. Possible Move: Informal influence on policy direction, advocating fiscal spending & investment in domestic sectors to counter global demand shock. --- What Singapore Will Likely Do Differently Than 1998 ✅ No Currency Pegs ? MAS will not peg SGD to USD like Malaysia did in 1998, but it may intervene heavily to prevent a collapse. ✅ Controlled Stimulus ? Unlike 2020?s COVID-19 blank cheque spending, Singapore will selectively inject money (infrastructure, local employment, bank guarantees). ✅ Foreign Talent & Visa Adjustments ? Singapore may tighten visas for non-essential foreign workers while attracting high-net-worth individuals to bring capital. --- What This Means for OCBC, UOB, and DBS If ASEAN collapses, Singapore banks will see higher bad loans from their Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam exposure. Capital flight to Singapore will boost deposit bases, stabilizing OCBC, UOB, and DBS?s funding. If banks trade at <0.8x P/B or dividends exceed 6.5%, it signals deep undervaluation and a buying opportunity. Would you wait for clear government action before buying Singapore banks, or would you start buying once banks hit crisis-level valuations? |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
01-Apr-2025 09:48
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
If Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines face another major Asian financial crisis in 2026, history suggests they will respond differently based on current economic structures and political realities. Here?s what could happen this time, 28 years after the 1998 crisis:
--- 1. Thailand (1998: Sold Gold Reserves) → 2026 Scenario 1998 Crisis Response: Thailand sold gold reserves and implemented IMF-backed austerity measures. The baht collapsed, causing mass bankruptcies. 2026 Crisis Possibilities: Thailand may not sell gold this time, as it has learned from 1998. Instead, it could use foreign exchange reserves (~$220B in 2024) to support the baht. Tourism collapse risk (especially post-earthquake) could push Thailand toward more foreign borrowing rather than immediate austerity. --- 2. Malaysia (1998: Imposed Capital Controls & Pegged MYR at 3.8/USD) → 2026 Scenario 1998 Crisis Response: Refused the IMF, instead pegging the ringgit (MYR) to USD at 3.8. Restricted foreign currency outflows, preventing a currency crash. 2026 Crisis Possibilities: Malaysia might not reimpose a hard currency peg, as it now relies more on global capital markets. Instead, selective capital controls (on foreign withdrawals, digital assets, or USD transactions) could be introduced. If oil prices are low, Petronas cash reserves could be used to stabilize the ringgit. --- 3. Indonesia (1998: IMF Bailout & Inflation Spiral) → 2026 Scenario 1998 Crisis Response: IMF bailout ($40B) in exchange for austerity measures. The rupiah crashed from 2,500 to 16,800 per USD, leading to extreme inflation. 2026 Crisis Possibilities: The rupiah could collapse again, but Indonesia?s forex reserves (~$145B in 2024) give it a short-term buffer. IMF intervention is likely, but Indonesia could also turn to China?s AIIB or BRICS bank instead. Severe inflation would return if Indonesia prints money to cover deficits. --- 4. The Philippines (1998: Belt-Tightening & Foreign Loans) → 2026 Scenario 1998 Crisis Response: IMF & World Bank loans used to stabilize the peso. Massive austerity, causing slow recovery. 2026 Crisis Possibilities: The Philippines might turn to China instead of the IMF, given China?s growing regional influence. If the peso collapses, the government may hike interest rates aggressively, hurting domestic consumption. OFW (Overseas Filipino Workers) remittances (~$40B/year) will be critical?if global demand for Filipino labor weakens, the crisis could worsen. --- What?s Different in 2026 Compared to 1998? 1. China is a Major Player ? Unlike 1998, China could provide bailout funding to countries like Indonesia and the Philippines via AIIB, BRICS Bank, or direct swaps. 2. Digital Currencies & Capital Flight ? Countries might restrict crypto & digital asset flows to prevent capital flight. 3. Higher Global Debt Levels ? Unlike 1998, many Asian countries already have high debt-to-GDP ratios, limiting their ability to borrow. 4. Geopolitical Factors (U.S.-China Tensions) ? A Trump 2.0 administration might influence who gets IMF or U.S. support, potentially isolating China-friendly nations. --- Conclusion: How This Affects Singapore Banks (OCBC, UOB, DBS)? Capital Flight to Singapore: If ASEAN currencies collapse, Singapore?s safe-haven status could attract inflows. Impact on Bank Loans & NPLs: DBS, OCBC, and UOB?s exposure to Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand could lead to rising non-performing loans (NPLs). Buying Opportunity: If DBS, OCBC, or UOB trade at <0.8x P/B or >6.5% dividend yield, it could signal a crisis-induced buying opportunity. Would you adjust your buying strategy based on how different governments react, or would you stick to your valuation-driven approach regardless of policy moves? |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
20-Mar-2025 09:23
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
UOL could be an attractive acquisition target for the late Wee Cho Yaw's son, Wee Ee Cheong, given his role as Deputy Chairman and CEO of UOB. Here?s why UOL might be of interest, especially in the current market situation:
1. Strong Ties Between UOL and UOB
UOL is closely linked to UOB?the Wee family controls UOL, with UOB owning over 30% of UOL?s shares.
Given Wee Ee Cheong?s leadership at UOB, he has direct influence over UOL?s direction.
2. Consolidating the Family?s Holdings
UOL is a valuable real estate asset, and taking full control could preserve and strengthen the Wee family?s influence in Singapore?s property sector.
Wee Ee Cheong may want to increase UOB?s exposure to property through UOL, similar to how Hong Kong tycoons consolidate banking and property businesses.
3. Current Market Conditions Favor Acquisitions
Property stocks are undervalued in Singapore due to rising interest rates and cooling measures, making UOL cheaper compared to its long-term asset value.
If interest rates peak or start to decline, property stocks like UOL could rebound, making it a timely acquisition target.
4. Unlocking Value Through Privatization
UOL is trading below its book value, meaning a takeover and privatization could unlock value by restructuring or selling assets at a higher price.
By taking UOL private, the Wee family could manage the company more flexibly without public shareholder pressure.
5. Synergies With UOB?s Real Estate Financing
UOB has a strong mortgage and real estate financing business.
Owning UOL outright could deepen synergies between banking and property, similar to how Hong Kong?s HSBC and Hang Seng Bank finance their affiliated property groups.
Challenges
Funding: A full acquisition would require significant capital, possibly requiring UOB?s involvement.
Regulatory Approval: Singapore authorities might scrutinize the deal, especially if UOB plays a role.
Market Sentiment: If property cooling measures persist, UOL?s valuation may remain low for an extended period.
Conclusion
If Wee Ee Cheong wants to secure UOL as a long-term family asset and take advantage of weak valuations, now could be a good time to consider a privatization or increased stake acquisition. However, he would need to balance it with UOB?s capital allocation priorities.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
17-Mar-2025 14:45
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Ping An Insurance Group, HSBC's largest shareholder, is reportedly considering reducing its 8% stake in the bank, valued at approximately $17.9 billion. This development follows a period of tension between the two companies, with Ping An advocating for strategic reforms at HSBC, including the potential spin-off of its Asian operations.
morningstar.com+3straitstimes.com+3morningstar.co.uk+3 Earlier this month, Ping An's asset management arm sold $50 million worth of HSBC shares, decreasing its stake from 8.01% to 7.98%. This marked the first disclosed sale since Ping An began its campaign for structural changes at HSBC. yicaiglobal.com+4insurancebusinessmag.com+4theedgesingapore.com+4 In response to Ping An's calls for reform, HSBC has announced a significant restructuring plan aimed at simplifying its operations and focusing more on its Asian markets. The bank is dividing its operations between Eastern and Western markets to reduce costs amid geopolitical tensions and to better serve its corporate clients in Asia. reuters.com thetimes.co.uk Despite these internal challenges, HSBC reported strong financial performance in the third quarter, with profits reaching $8.5 billion, surpassing analysts' expectations. The bank also announced a $3 billion share buyback plan, reflecting its robust capital position. marketwatch.com The evolving relationship between Ping An and HSBC continues to be a focal point for investors, especially considering the strategic shifts and financial outcomes that may result from these developments. HSBC's Strategic Overhaul Amid Shareholder Tensions Faviconreuters.com HSBC's global brand in the balance as it doubles down on Asia bet 47 days ago Faviconthetimes.co.uk HSBC overhauls operations as tensions between China and the West grow 145 days ago HSBC overhauls operations as tensions between China and the West grow Faviconmarketwatch.com HSBC shares surge on another $3 billion buyback plan and earnings beat 138 days ago HSBC shares surge on another $3 billion buyback plan and earnings beat |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
17-Mar-2025 14:40
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/HSBC-HOLDINGS-4001224/company-shareholders/
Major shareholders: HSBC HOLDINGS Name Equities % Valuation Ping An Asset Management Co., Ltd. 1,502,584,731 8.436 % 17 664 M p The Vanguard Group, Inc. 699,198,805 3.926 % 8 219 M p Norges Bank Investment Management 597,320,532 3.354 % 7 022 M p BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd. 465,876,416 2.616 % 5 477 M p The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (Investment Management) 417,783,000 2.346 % 4 911 M p BlackRock Fund Advisors 333,498,728 1.872 % 3 920 M p BlackRock Advisors (UK) Ltd. 272,225,499 1.528 % 3 200 M p Legal & General Investment Management Ltd. 247,922,294 1.392 % 2 914 M p SSgA Funds Management, Inc. 219,612,426 1.233 % 2 582 M p Vanguard Global Advisers LLC 193,115,128 1.084 % 2 270 M p |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
17-Mar-2025 14:27
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
近 期 ， 受 美 国 总 统 唐 纳 德 ·特 朗 普 经 济 政 策 ， 尤 其 是 关 税 政 策 的 影 响 ， 许 多 美 国 散 户 投 资 者 对 股 市 前 景 感 到 担 忧 ， 开 始 重 新 评 估 投 资 策 略 。 一 些 投 资 者 选 择 减 持 美 股 ， 转 而 投 资 于 现 金 、 债 券 、 黄 金 等 避 险 资 产 ， 以 及 欧 洲 军 工 股 等 领 域 。
例 如 ， 82岁 的 投 资 者 约 拉 姆 ·阿 里 埃 利 （ Yoram Ariely） 多 年 来 一 直 持 有 大 量 股 票 ， 但 上 周 二 ， 他 抛 售 了 近 一 半 的 股 票 投 资 ， 担 心 特 朗 普 的 经 济 议 程 和 关 税 政 策 可 能 带 来 的 影 响 。 在 此 背 景 下 ， 投 资 者 对 美 债 的 关 注 度 有 所 提 升 。 根 据 雪 球 网 的 分 析 ， 投 资 美 债 的 方 式 包 括 购 买 美 债 类 资 产 ， 如 短 期 、 中 期 和 长 期 美 债 ETF等 。 这 些 投 资 方 式 在 当 前 市 场 环 境 下 被 视 为 不 错 的 投 资 机 会 。 xueqiu.com+1xueqiu.com+1 xueqiu.com 总 体 而 言 ， 面 对 政 策 不 确 定 性 和 市 场 波 动 ， 投 资 者 正 寻 求 多 元 化 的 投 资 组 合 ， 以 降 低 风 险 并 保 护 资 产 。 |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
17-Mar-2025 14:18
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
3月 16日 ， 百 度 正 式 发 布 了 两 款 全 新 的 人 工 智 能 模 型 ： 文 心 大 模 型 X1和 文 心 大 模 型 4.5。 其 中 ， 文 心 大 模 型 X1是 一 款 专 注 于 深 度 思 考 的 推 理 模 型 ， 性 能 可 比 肩 DeepSeek的 R1模 型 ， 但 价 格 仅 为 其 一 半 。 该 模 型 具 备 ?长 思 维 链 ?， 擅 长 中 文 知 识 问 答 、 文 学 创 作 和 逻 辑 推 理 等 任 务 。 此 外 ， X1还 增 加 了 多 模 态 能 力 和 多 工 具 调 用 功 能 ， 能 够 理 解 和 生 成 图 片 ， 并 调 用 工 具 生 成 代 码 、 图 表 等 丰 富 内 容 。
finance.sina.com.cn+1news.qq.com+1 news.qq.com+2news.qq.com+2finance.sina.com.cn+2 同 时 发 布 的 文 心 大 模 型 4.5是 百 度 首 个 原 生 多 模 态 大 模 型 ， 其 多 模 态 理 解 、 文 本 和 逻 辑 推 理 能 力 显 著 提 升 。 该 模 型 不 仅 具 备 图 形 推 理 、 图 表 分 析 等 ?高 智 商 ?能 力 ， 还 能 够 理 解 梗 图 、 漫 画 、 歌 曲 和 电 影 等 多 模 态 内 容 ， 展 现 出 ?高 情 商 ?。 在 多 项 测 试 中 ， 文 心 大 模 型 4.5的 表 现 优 于 GPT-4.5， API调 用 价 格 仅 为 GPT-4.5的 1%。 news.qq.com+1news.qq.com+1 finance.sina.com.cn+2news.qq.com+2sohu.com+2 目 前 ， 用 户 可 以 在 文 心 一 言 官 网 免 费 体 验 这 两 款 新 模 型 。 企 业 及 开 发 者 也 可 在 百 度 智 能 云 千 帆 大 模 型 平 台 调 用 新 模 型 。 文 心 大 模 型 4.5的 输 入 价 格 为 每 千 tokens 0.004元 ， 输 出 价 格 为 每 千 tokens 0.016元 ； 文 心 大 模 型 X1的 输 入 价 格 为 每 千 tokens 0.002元 ， 输 出 价 格 为 每 千 tokens 0.008元 。 news.qq.com+4finance.sina.com.cn+4news.qq.com+4 news.qq.com+1finance.sina.com.cn+1 这 些 发 布 标 志 着 百 度 在 人 工 智 能 领 域 的 持 续 创 新 ， 进 一 步 推 动 了 AI技 术 的 发 展 和 应 用 。 |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
17-Mar-2025 13:09
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
That sounds like a solid strategy if you're positioning for a recovery after a U.S. recession.
OCBC & UOB: Singapore banks tend to benefit from strong capital positions, dividend resilience, and regional growth, especially when global markets rebound post-recession. Lower U.S. interest rates after a recession could also support bank stock valuations. City Developments (CityDev): If a U.S. recession drags global sentiment lower, property stocks like CityDev may get hit, but Singapore's property market tends to be resilient. If you believe in a rebound, buying at depressed valuations could be an opportunity. Would you wait for a deeper correction, or are you planning to accumulate gradually? |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
17-Mar-2025 08:15
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
As of March 17, 2025, U.S. stock markets have experienced a decline of approximately 10% from their recent highs, entering correction territory. This downturn is largely attributed to escalating trade tensions and the anticipation of new reciprocal tariffs set to take effect on April 2 under President Donald Trump's administration.
The upcoming tariffs are expected to impact various sectors, including automotive, semiconductors, lumber, and copper industries. These measures have raised concerns about increased production costs, disrupted supply chains, and higher consumer prices. Such economic pressures could dampen consumer spending, a critical driver of U.S. economic growth.
The concept of a "wealth effect" suggests that significant declines in stock market valuations can lead to reduced spending by higher-income households, further slowing economic activity. Additionally, businesses facing uncertainty may delay investments and hiring, contributing to an economic slowdown.
Economists are increasingly concerned that the combination of trade tensions, market volatility, and potential declines in consumer and business spending could push the U.S. economy toward a recession. The Federal Reserve is under pressure to adjust monetary policy to mitigate these risks, but the effectiveness of such measures remains uncertain in the face of persistent trade disputes.
In summary, while the new tariffs are intended to protect domestic industries, their broader economic impact?including the potential to trigger a recession?has become a subject of significant concern among economists and policymakers.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
13-Mar-2025 14:31
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
That sounds like a prudent strategy?having sufficient cash reserves to weather potential economic challenges after Singapore?s 2025 election. If you expect the next five years to be tough, prioritizing liquidity, low debt, and financial stability makes sense.
Key Considerations for Your Strategy 1. Avoiding New Debt Interest rates might remain uncertain, so avoiding unnecessary borrowing protects you from rising costs. Paying down existing debts (if any) strengthens your financial position. 2. Maintaining a Strong Cash Reserve Having enough liquidity ensures flexibility to navigate market downturns or unexpected expenses. Keeping cash in high-yield savings accounts, T-bills, or cash management funds helps preserve capital while earning some yield. 3. Investment Approach A more defensive stance: Favoring cash-rich, undervalued assets (e.g., Singapore banks) with strong dividend yields. Avoiding speculative bets or leverage during potential economic uncertainty. 4. Singapore?s Post-Election Landscape Policy changes, economic shifts, or new leadership directions could impact investment opportunities. Keeping an eye on how government strategies might affect sectors like property, finance, and infrastructure. Would you like to discuss specific investment adjustments based on this outlook? |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
12-Mar-2025 10:49
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Salesforce's US$1 billion investment in Singapore over five years highlights its commitment to expanding AI innovation and deepening its presence in the region. The investment will support Salesforce?s Singapore research hub and drive AI advancements, particularly in customer relationship management (CRM) and enterprise solutions.
A key part of this initiative is Salesforce's collaboration with Singapore Airlines (SIA) to co-develop AI solutions for the aviation industry. This could enhance personalized customer experiences, operational efficiency, and predictive analytics for SIA, reinforcing its position as a leading global airline. This move aligns with Singapore?s push to become a major AI and technology hub, attracting top global firms to invest in innovation and digital transformation. It could also strengthen Salesforce?s footprint in Asia-Pacific as businesses increasingly adopt AI-driven solutions. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
chartistkao3
Elite |
10-Mar-2025 15:00
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Since its independence in 1965, Singapore&rsquo s economic strategy has involved a careful balancing act between political priorities&mdash often reflecting the ruling party&rsquo s long-term vision and national interests&mdash and the practical need to generate wealth to maintain a high standard of living amid inflationary pressures. Here&rsquo s how these two aspects have interacted:
In essence, while politics and party interests shape Singapore&rsquo s long-term strategic direction, the emphasis on wealth creation through market efficiency and sound economic policies has been crucial in managing inflation and sustaining a high standard of living. This dual approach&mdash integrating robust state planning with vibrant private-sector dynamics&mdash remains a cornerstone of Singapore&rsquo s economic success.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkao3
Elite |
10-Mar-2025 14:49
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
why waste money and time in them
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkao3
Elite |
10-Mar-2025 14:48
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
https://tradingeconomics.com/singapore/6-month-bill-yield
The MAS 6-month T-bills yield remains relatively low because they are designed to be a safe, short-term, and highly liquid investment, reflecting the prevailing risk-free interest rate environment. In the current context, where inflation is high&mdash partly driven by a 9% GST increase&mdash the nominal yield on these T-bills does not keep pace with the rising cost of living. In real terms, when you subtract inflation from the yield, investors experience negative returns, meaning their purchasing power erodes over time. This makes T-bills unattractive for those looking to preserve capital or achieve positive real returns, even though they offer security and liquidity.
https://tradingeconomics.com/singapore/6-month-bill-yield
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkao3
Elite |
10-Mar-2025 14:44
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
https://www.dividends.sg/view/u11#google_vignette
Investors might consider buying UOB shares before the ex-dividend date of 28 April 2025 for several reasons:
o3-mini
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkao3
Elite |
10-Mar-2025 14:40
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
10-Mar-2025 10:28
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The Wee family, which controls UOL Group, chose to keep ownership of their real estate empire instead of following CapitaLand?s asset-light, investment-driven model. Here?s why the tycoon-owned UOL took a different path than government-linked CapitaLand Investment (CLI):
--- 1. Family-Controlled vs. Government-Linked Strategy UOL (Wee Family-Owned): UOL is controlled by the Wee family, which also owns United Overseas Bank (UOB). As a family-run business, UOL focuses on long-term asset accumulation, rather than chasing short-term market trends. The Wee family prefers to own and control prime real estate, maintaining an asset-heavy model. CapitaLand Investment (Temasek-Controlled): CapitaLand was spun off into an asset-light investment manager (CLI) in 2021, shifting focus from development to capital-efficient fund management. As a Temasek-linked entity, CapitaLand had to optimize capital returns, leading it to recycle assets and scale its investment management business. CLI operates like a global real estate fund manager, earning fees from managing third-party capital. --- 2. Owning Prime Assets vs. Recycling Capital UOL: Keeps Prime Assets for Long-Term Growth UOL retains ownership of key properties (e.g., Pan Pacific Hotels, Marina Centre, and residential developments). Rather than selling assets into REITs like CapitaLand, UOL benefits from long-term appreciation and stable rental income. This strategy mirrors how UOB operates?focusing on stable, conservative wealth accumulation over speculation. CapitaLand: Sells Assets and Focuses on REITs CapitaLand spins off properties into REITs (e.g., CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust, Ascendas REIT). The group earns fees by managing real estate funds, rather than owning assets directly. This allows CapitaLand to scale quickly, but it sacrifices full ownership of key properties. --- 3. Market Cyclicality: Stability vs. Liquidity UOL: Prefers Stability in Downturns UOL?s asset-heavy model means it can hold properties through market downturns without being forced to sell. This approach works well for families who think in multi-generational wealth terms rather than short-term market cycles. CapitaLand Investment: Prioritizes Liquidity CLI?s strategy allows it to exit markets or asset classes quickly, recycling capital into higher-yielding investments. However, it also means CapitaLand doesn?t fully control all its assets?REIT investors have a say in major decisions. --- 4. UOL?s Conservative Banking DNA vs. CapitaLand?s Institutional Focus UOL?s parent company, UOB, is Singapore?s most conservative bank, reflecting the Wee family?s prudent approach. Unlike CapitaLand, which operates like a global investment firm, UOL prefers measured, risk-averse expansion. The Wee family?s control means they don?t need to cater to institutional investors, unlike CapitaLand, which must deliver high returns to shareholders. --- Conclusion: Why the Wee Family Prefers UOL?s Asset-Heavy Model Full Ownership: Unlike CapitaLand, UOL doesn?t rely on REITs or external investors?it keeps its best assets. Long-Term Wealth Building: The Wee family focuses on holding and growing valuable properties rather than flipping them for quick profits. Lower Volatility: UOL is less exposed to short-term market cycles compared to CapitaLand?s REIT-driven, fund-management approach. While CapitaLand Investment is structured for scale and capital efficiency, the Wee family prefers UOL?s controlled, asset-rich strategy, ensuring long-term stability and generational wealth. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
10-Mar-2025 10:23
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The competition between government-backed DBS Land (later CapitaLand) and tycoon-controlled City Developments Limited (CDL) has shaped Singapore?s real estate landscape for decades. Here?s how the two differed in strategy, ownership, and how punters viewed them:
--- 1. Ownership & Control: Government vs. Tycoon-Driven DBS Land (CapitaLand): Originally part of DBS Bank, it was later controlled by Temasek Holdings, the Singapore government?s investment arm. The Pidemco Land merger in 2000 created CapitaLand, consolidating Temasek?s real estate assets. Government backing meant it had access to cheap capital, prime land, and strategic partnerships, but it also had less flexibility than a private developer. CDL (City Developments Limited): Founded by Hong Leong Group?s Kwek family, led by billionaire Kwek Leng Beng. As a family-controlled company, CDL operated with entrepreneurial agility, making bold moves in property development and global expansion. The Kwek family?s personal stake meant they had more skin in the game, unlike DBS Land?s institutional ownership. --- 2. Business Model: Developer vs. Investment & REIT Play DBS Land (CapitaLand): Initially a developer, but after becoming CapitaLand, it focused on real estate investment, capital recycling, and REITs. CapitaLand pioneered the REIT model in Singapore, launching CapitaMall Trust in 2002. Eventually shifted to an asset-light model, exiting pure property development in 2021 and listing CapitaLand Investment (CLI). CDL: Remained a traditional property developer focused on residential, commercial, and hospitality projects. Unlike CapitaLand, CDL was slower to adopt REITs, only launching CDL Hospitality Trusts in 2006. Still holds significant landbank, meaning it carries more exposure to property cycles than CapitaLand. --- 3. Stock Market Perception: Punters' Favorite vs. Defensive Play DBS Land/CapitaLand: Seen as a stable, government-backed stock, attracting long-term institutional investors. Speculative interest surged during mergers and restructuring, such as the 2000 CapitaLand formation and the 2021 split into CLI and CapitaLand Development. Tended to have lower volatility than CDL due to Temasek?s backing. CDL: A favorite among traders and punters due to its higher beta, more frequent price swings, and direct property exposure. Punters speculated on CDL during property booms, especially in the 1990s and mid-2000s, when Singapore real estate soared. CDL?s aggressive international expansion also made it more exposed to global cycles, creating opportunities for traders. --- 4. Crisis Response: Government Stability vs. Tycoon Maneuvering DBS Land/CapitaLand: During crises like the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis and 2008 GFC, CapitaLand had the advantage of government support, ensuring financial stability. Able to raise capital easily due to Temasek?s backing, unlike CDL. CDL: More vulnerable to market downturns as a private entity, but the Kwek family?s deep pockets allowed it to survive major crises. Took bold bets, such as acquiring distressed assets in the US and UK after the GFC. In 2020 (COVID-19 crash), CDL suffered from its troubled China investment in Sincere Property, causing losses and investor panic. --- 5. Long-Term Outcome: CapitaLand's Institutional Path vs. CDL?s Family Legacy CapitaLand (ex-DBS Land): Evolved into a global real estate investment giant, shifting away from pure development. Now split into CapitaLand Investment (CLI), a high-return, capital-efficient investment management firm, and CapitaLand Development, the remaining development arm. More aligned with global institutional investors than retail traders. CDL: Remains a developer-first company, still controlled by the Kwek family. Continues to bet on global projects but faces market cyclicality due to its asset-heavy approach. Retains its trading appeal for punters due to its exposure to property cycles. --- Conclusion: A Tale of Two Real Estate Giants CapitaLand (ex-DBS Land) became institutionalized, less speculative, and focused on real estate investment & REITs. CDL remained a tycoon-controlled developer, offering higher volatility and trading potential. Punters have always favored CDL for speculation, while long-term investors saw CapitaLand as a defensive blue-chip. Both played critical roles in shaping Singapore?s property sector, but their paths diverged?CapitaLand became a global investment player, while CDL stayed true to its roots as a property developer. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
chartistkaohz
Master |
10-Mar-2025 10:20
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
How Punters Gambled on DBS Land (1987?2021)
DBS Land was a battleground for punters from its IPO in 1987 to its transformation into CapitaLand Investment in 2021. Its stock saw speculative activity driven by property cycles, mergers, and restructuring events. Here?s how punters rode the waves: --- 1. 1987 IPO and Black Monday Crash DBS Land was listed in 1987, just before the Black Monday crash, which wiped out global markets. Punters who bought near IPO highs saw the stock plunge as sentiment collapsed. However, long-term investors who held on saw it recover as Singapore?s property market rebounded in the 1990s. --- 2. 1990s Property Boom & Asian Financial Crisis (1997-98) In the early 1990s, Singapore?s real estate sector was booming, and DBS Land became a favorite of traders riding the bull market. The stock surged along with rising commercial and residential property prices. When the Asian Financial Crisis hit in 1997-98, property prices crashed, and DBS Land shares collapsed, wiping out many leveraged punters. Those who panic-sold at the bottom missed the eventual recovery. --- 3. The 2000 DBS Land-Pidemco Merger into CapitaLand The merger announcement led to wild speculation, as punters bet on potential synergies and the new entity?s dominance. CapitaLand shares were volatile in the early years as investors adjusted to its asset-light REIT strategy instead of pure property development. Traders who bet on quick capital gains often got burned by long restructuring periods. --- 4. CapitaLand?s REIT Boom and Global Expansion (2002?2010s) The launch of CapitaMall Trust in 2002 (Singapore?s first REIT) sparked speculative frenzies in property stocks. Punters who jumped in early rode the REIT wave, while latecomers often bought near peaks. CapitaLand expanded aggressively in China, Vietnam, and other markets, attracting momentum traders during real estate booms. However, the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) saw CapitaLand shares plummet, punishing those who overleveraged. --- 5. Post-GFC Recovery & China Growth (2010?2019) As China?s property market boomed, CapitaLand became a proxy for China real estate exposure. Punters speculated on its China residential and commercial projects, sometimes ignoring long-term fundamentals. The 2015 China stock market crash and policy tightening led to short-term selloffs, trapping retail traders who chased the rally. --- 6. The 2021 Restructuring: CapitaLand Investment vs. CapitaLand Development In 2021, CapitaLand was privatized, and its investment management arm (CLI) was spun off as a listed entity. Traders scrambled to position themselves, some betting on a rally in CLI, while others speculated on CapitaLand?s privatization premium. Those who misunderstood the restructuring saw short-term volatility, but long-term holders benefited as CLI became a leading global real estate investment manager. --- Conclusion Punters who treated DBS Land and CapitaLand as short-term trades often got caught in boom-and-bust cycles. The biggest winners were long-term investors who held through crashes, mergers, and restructuring, as CapitaLand evolved into a real estate investment giant. Like in all speculative cycles, those who overleveraged during peaks suffered, while those who understood the long-term strategy and fundamental shifts profited. |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||