TEE Intl   

TEE International

Still can go in?

 

Yes before right it was trading at 20c....Ex right 16c....

WL123456      ( Date: 19-Mar-2019 17:07) Posted: Haha I join you la . Tml sure cheong ? Volume so high . Powerful shoot up. . Maybe not too late to buy tml ? ahhuat08      ( Date: 19-Mar-2019 17:04) Posted: y no one discuss this counter?

 

Haha I join you la . Tml sure cheong ? Volume so high . Powerful shoot up. . Maybe not too late to buy tml ?

ahhuat08      ( Date: 19-Mar-2019 17:04) Posted: y no one discuss this counter?

 

y no one discuss this counter?

 

Can recalled who were those votes that spoilt the GO ? The CEO laughing maybe said " Heng Ah!" ..

edwinjup      ( Date: 07-Dec-2018 14:02) Posted: mgt wan to delist the company cheap at 21.5....we. Rejected.....now price getting weaker......maybe we should remove the whole mgt team also..lol ykjuay      ( Date: 04-Dec-2018 10:38) Posted: keep eating at lot of 312,000, in a very fast manner , something good  must be happening soon in this  counter

 

Now right issue at 10c....GO 21.5c don't want leh....Mr Phua laughing to the bank ?

edwinjup      ( Date: 07-Dec-2018 14:02) Posted: mgt wan to delist the company cheap at 21.5....we. Rejected.....now price getting weaker......maybe we should remove the whole mgt team also..lol ykjuay      ( Date: 04-Dec-2018 10:38) Posted: keep eating at lot of 312,000, in a very fast manner , something good  must be happening soon in this  counter

 

mgt wan to delist the company cheap at 21.5....we. Rejected.....now price getting weaker......maybe we should remove the whole mgt team also..lol

ykjuay      ( Date: 04-Dec-2018 10:38) Posted: keep eating at lot of 312,000, in a very fast manner , something good  must be happening soon in this  counter

 

keep eating at lot of 312,000, in a very fast manner , something good  must be happening soon in this  counter

 

Aztech also coming Friday at Suntec 10am to do about the same thing hope investors also foil them.

fruitfulness      ( Date: 03-Apr-2017 14:26) Posted: Not vested.  I think this is another example of delisting/privatisation on the cheap. To me, this is a scumbag/dishonourable of arrangement. Official reason is to allow greater flexibility for the group ???  Premium to the last traded price is less than 15%.  I suggest SGX should not allow delisting by companies not in the watchlist, at a price lower than highest traded price within the past 3 years ... Anyway, we are starting to have exploitative delisting situations emerging lately (after the Aztech saga) ... big fish eating/exploiting small fish or a bully kind of arrangement!  And the regulators sanction it!  I believe this will further erode investors' trust in the SGX!

 

Delisting failed.....song

 

I am indeed using my brain. Did I say SGX should stop the delisting? I am saying regulators should introduce rules to reduce exploitative delisting.
 

cccx123      ( Date: 03-Apr-2017 15:51) Posted: If sgx stops the delisting, which company do you think will ever want to list on sgx again? Use you brain. Just because you lost money doesn't mean you need to go cowing to some higher power. It is your own fault. fruitfulness      ( Date: 03-Apr-2017 14:26) Posted: Not vested.  I think this is another example of delisting/privatisation on the cheap. To me, this is a scumbag/dishonourable of arrangement. Official reason is to allow greater flexibility for the group ???  Premium to the last traded price is less than 15%.  I suggest SGX should not allow delisting by companies not in the watchlist, at a price lower than highest traded price within the past 3 years ... Anyway, we are starting to have exploitative delisting situations emerging lately (after the Aztech saga) ... big fish eating/exploiting small fish or a bully kind of arrangement!  And the regulators sanction it!  I believe this will further erode investors' trust in the SGX!

 

If sgx stops the delisting, which company do you think will ever want to list on sgx again? Use you brain. Just because you lost money doesn't mean you need to go cowing to some higher power. It is your own fault.

fruitfulness      ( Date: 03-Apr-2017 14:26) Posted: Not vested.  I think this is another example of delisting/privatisation on the cheap. To me, this is a scumbag/dishonourable of arrangement. Official reason is to allow greater flexibility for the group ???  Premium to the last traded price is less than 15%.  I suggest SGX should not allow delisting by companies not in the watchlist, at a price lower than highest traded price within the past 3 years ... Anyway, we are starting to have exploitative delisting situations emerging lately (after the Aztech saga) ... big fish eating/exploiting small fish or a bully kind of arrangement!  And the regulators sanction it!  I believe this will further erode investors' trust in the SGX!

 

Not vested.  I think this is another example of delisting/privatisation on the cheap. To me, this is a scumbag/dishonourable of arrangement. Official reason is to allow greater flexibility for the group ???  Premium to the last traded price is less than 15%.  I suggest SGX should not allow delisting by companies not in the watchlist, at a price lower than highest traded price within the past 3 years ...

Anyway, we are starting to have exploitative delisting situations emerging lately (after the Aztech saga) ... big fish eating/exploiting small fish or a bully kind of arrangement!  And the regulators sanction it!  I believe this will further erode investors' trust in the SGX!

 

Yes, agree it' s a bit disappointing and a bit low balling with only ~12% premium to last closing price. But as i know it, Phua is a very shrewd person, so I wasn' t expecting too much and would be surprised if he offered the widely expected $0.25. 

Reckon as small investors, what we can do is if we band together to reject (which obviously no one would bother to), or an angel investor (fall from heaven) and buy up the market share to a more fair value and bargain with Phua. In summary, sometimes we really lan lan suck thumb and can only hope some justice be served in the market.

 

Aiyoh - this one is another Scheme of Arrangement and only need 75% to privatised? And they already control almost 70%? Sianz.

 

Aztech, Tee, Vard ... all examples.

Maybe next is Ezion? Or Noble? Such big priCE difference from last time.
Even counters like Pacific Radiance, Triyards, RH Petrogas, Dyna ... etc.

Those with potential for growth and can easily be bought over, are good targets for rich investors.

Those vested at low price profits while those holding at high price will be at a disadvantage.

 

I agree, Not so bad if still buyout at minimum NAV or NTA price. Tee Land trading at around 20cents but NAV more than 30cents, if privatize at NAV will be fantastic. No wonder saw some activities there recently.

HazardKoh      ( Date: 02-Apr-2017 12:25) Posted: For the rest of us, go look for undervalued counters where the NTA is much higher than share price and the NTA is tangible one and not those intangible one and wait for privatisation. Even if the owner privatise at low price, u still can gain profit if u buy now at low share price  :)

 

For the rest of us, go look for undervalued counters where the NTA is much higher than share price and the NTA is tangible one and not those intangible one and wait for privatisation.

Even if the owner privatise at low price, u still can gain profit if u buy now at low share price  :)

 

 

Not vested but sad for other minorities.

 

Mr Phua only give 21.5c want to take it private....similar like Aztech loh....what % of share he hold ?..

edwinjup      ( Date: 01-Apr-2017 21:59) Posted: lousy mgt intend to buyout at 21.5c.. damn edwinjup      ( Date: 30-Mar-2017 21:21) Posted: nra gave a fair value of 34.5c for tee int in oct 2016..as the company control quite numbers of listed co....u all can goggle under tee int research report......so mr phua...pls give a reasonable and fair delist price.... 😀