Creative    Last:0.81   -

Creative files lawsuit against Nvidia in US

Drop.liao lor

 

Should follow AEM do a 3 for 1 or better still 5 for 1 stock bonus. Increase liquidity in order for funds to come in big. 

 

very nice opening

 

Yesterday consolidate whole afternoon, but no forces were able to bring down the share price. 

 

Dow up/ down 300 points like norm now

 

Yesterday whole afternoon consolidation, so those contra guys should have sold. Waiting for powerful chng kays to take it much higher. 

Sgvale      ( Date: 27-Feb-2018 08:26) Posted: $5 today ?

 

$5 today ?

 

Dow jones green....if now creative annouce lawsuit win then it will be prefect...all e best lol

 

up lah ...

Battle123      ( Date: 26-Feb-2018 22:58) Posted: Someone say up some say down I think watch show better

 

Someone say up some say down

I think watch show better

 

Well said. I think you hit the nail on its head. Spot on. 

SmallSmall      ( Date: 26-Feb-2018 20:18) Posted: Price is relative. It is high if you look from the low. it is low if you look from the high. Creative has always been strong in its engineering as evident from the many patents that it holds and successfully sued for damages. Their weak point is trying to sell their own products where they lose out in branding. Their Super X-Fi is not just a product. As a product I do not think it will sell well. The market is looking at the immense potential in the patent to license these Super X -Fi chips to the major headphone players which Mr Sim finally concedes is the way Creative should position itself into. Imagine 3D headphone sound as the new headphone industry standards and you will see why the market is so excited about Creative Tech future potentials.

 

Price is relative. It is high if you look from the low.
it is low if you look from the high.
Creative has always been strong in its engineering as evident from the many patents that it holds and successfully sued for damages.
Their weak point is trying to sell their own products where they lose out in branding.
Their Super X-Fi is not just a product. As a product I do not think it will sell well.
The market is looking at the immense potential in the patent to license these Super X -Fi chips to the major headphone players which Mr Sim finally concedes is the way Creative should position itself into.
Imagine 3D headphone sound as the new headphone industry standards and you will see why the market is so excited about Creative Tech future potentials.

 

 

Andy, hope u r right....hope good newd cmg

 

There are news which u and I do not know. 
And im sure good news is coming out.
I do believe that, creative will surge to $10 very soon..

Sgvale      ( Date: 26-Feb-2018 15:14) Posted: Better get out fast if still profit before buried in the quick sand.

 

These remisers are all very secretive.  They always have a " tell and dont tell" answers.
They only interested that you trade more but not interested to share the inside of the trading world.

limkt009      ( Date: 26-Feb-2018 15:58) Posted: Converted to trade representatives for the firm? Jackwoo      ( Date: 26-Feb-2018 15:20) Posted: Maybe I am wrong. But my remiser told me nowaday she got only commission in term of bonus.  She not really need to be responsible of the client losses.  Could this be the reason, they are just treating it like a desk bound job? Is it true that remiser need to fully responsible for the client losses?  Then the remiser can go bankrupt. Do you care to comment?  Thanks

 

Converted to trade representatives for the firm?

Jackwoo      ( Date: 26-Feb-2018 15:20) Posted: Maybe I am wrong. But my remiser told me nowaday she got only commission in term of bonus.  She not really need to be responsible of the client losses.  Could this be the reason, they are just treating it like a desk bound job? Is it true that remiser need to fully responsible for the client losses?  Then the remiser can go bankrupt. Do you care to comment?  Thanks. sbscap      ( Date: 26-Feb-2018 13:42) Posted: 15 years ago, I was in this retail broking business for about 1 year and left. I must tell you the average remisier back then has a huge knowledge and competency gap between what is expected and what he/she actually possess. This gap has risen because of internet - the knowledge and competency of clients have rocketed but many of the same remisiers are still there. Back then commission is 1%, average daily volume is over $1b. Now it is 0.25% and volume is low. Those who are still there are doing it for reasons only known to them. One such reason could be they have no other options. Of course I said average. In every trade, there are some very outstanding individuals. But it is hard to understand why an outstanding remisier is still in this dying trade

 

Maybe I am wrong.
But my remiser told me nowaday she got only commission in term of bonus.  She not really need to be responsible of the client losses.  Could this be the reason, they are just treating it like a desk bound job?
Is it true that remiser need to fully responsible for the client losses?  Then the remiser can go bankrupt.
Do you care to comment?  Thanks.

sbscap      ( Date: 26-Feb-2018 13:42) Posted: 15 years ago, I was in this retail broking business for about 1 year and left. I must tell you the average remisier back then has a huge knowledge and competency gap between what is expected and what he/she actually possess. This gap has risen because of internet - the knowledge and competency of clients have rocketed but many of the same remisiers are still there. Back then commission is 1%, average daily volume is over $1b. Now it is 0.25% and volume is low. Those who are still there are doing it for reasons only known to them. One such reason could be they have no other options. Of course I said average. In every trade, there are some very outstanding individuals. But it is hard to understand why an outstanding remisier is still in this dying trade. Huataarrhh      ( Date: 26-Feb-2018 13:09) Posted: I think you are being too harsh on your brokers. Their commissions are peanuts. And for those clients who don' t pay their contra losses, the brokers  would have to cover the losses

 

Better get out fast if still profit before buried in the quick sand.

 

Oh dear, The fever seems to subsiding . Traders back to rational.

 

15 years ago, I was in this retail broking business for about 1 year and left. I must tell you the average remisier back then has a huge knowledge and competency gap between what is expected and what he/she actually possess. This gap has risen because of internet - the knowledge and competency of clients have rocketed but many of the same remisiers are still there. Back then commission is 1%, average daily volume is over $1b. Now it is 0.25% and volume is low. Those who are still there are doing it for reasons only known to them. One such reason could be they have no other options. Of course I said average. In every trade, there are some very outstanding individuals. But it is hard to understand why an outstanding remisier is still in this dying trade.

Huataarrhh      ( Date: 26-Feb-2018 13:09) Posted: I think you are being too harsh on your brokers. Their commissions are peanuts. And for those clients who don' t pay their contra losses, the brokers  would have to cover the losses. investor7      ( Date: 26-Feb-2018 12:42) Posted: Congrats to those of u who huat from creative, got a super big hongbao.  But i feel sad to miss this rocket..... sigh....very sad, and wonder aloud, why after so many years, my broker never alert me to such lobangs whenever a stock suddenly rallies on good prospects, eg creative, cosco, JEP, etc.... and best world, genting SP in the past. Brokers' eyes are on the mkts all the time, yet we get left out in the cold while a hot stock flies off. Any of you fortunate to have on-the-ball brokers who alert u to these stocks early for u to make good profits? Why we pay commission to our brokers yet they r so passive? Why???