| Latest Forum Topics / United Engineers |
|
|
United Engineers
|
||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
25-Aug-2014 16:50
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Difference between F& N and UE. Charoen bought 22% of F& N from OCBC,at the point of purchase, he need not make an offer to public for the remaining shares.        In UE' s case, once the price with OCBC is agreed upon, and Charoen buys the 34% stake in UE, a general offer must be made to remaining shareholders  of UE(it is mandatory  under laws). After Charoen made the offer of $8.88 per F& N share  to the public in Sep 2012(same price paid to OCBC), he was snubbed by the shareholdrs.    He managed to bag only 10% more shares bringing his stake to 40% before he made the final bid of $9.55 in Jan 2013 after being challenged by OUE (OUE offered 9.08). Noting that in June, the F& N price was $6.34, the takeover bid of $8.88 already gives the shareholder a gain of $2.54.             
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
25-Aug-2014 12:24
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
What I meant was that Charoen knows he has to buy the balance of 66% from the other shareholders and it won' t be easy as many would not sell cheaply.  The fact that he went ahead to secure the 36% from OCBC shows he is willing to pay to get UE. If he offers $3 to UE shareholders, other predators would be interested coz UE is doing very well and the property portfolio is a nice addition.      But even without a bidding war, Charoen would have a hard time securing the balane 66%. UE is in a better position than F& N in this regard, to extract maximum price from the buyer. |
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
25-Aug-2014 12:14
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
We know all this, the buyer (Charoen)  has to pay a higher price to mop up the balance in order to hive off the properties.  The fact that he went ahead with OCBC already shows that UE is worth a lot more than $3.  Think about it.
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
25-Aug-2014 12:08
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Without a competitor, OCBC could sell their 36% to Charoen (and this price cannot be any  price plucked from the sky, consultant needs to be involved to  give a fair value price which is likely above  $3)  .    After Charoeon secures the 36%,  he needs to buy the balance from the market.  This is where the fun starts.    If you are a shareholder would you sell cheap? F& N there was some horse trading with Heineken, Charoen give up APB for F& N.      In UE, this won' t happen, Charoen needs to buy from the shareholders. So eventually, it could be a $1.5 to $2 gain from $3.  Anything below $3 is a bargain.  
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
Qanghoo
Supreme |
25-Aug-2014 12:02
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Was there a report of some interest from OUE?  But even if there is no competitor, wld the major shareholders sell < 3, given the potential intrinsic value not priced in at 2.79?  Don' t think OCBC are that desperate, are they.  They didn' t initiate a fire sale anyway.  So, they' d probably agree only if the offer is attractive, which 2.79 may not be.
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
25-Aug-2014 12:01
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Sorry, made a mistake, long term debt is 1.7 bln, short term 1 bln.      They have cash plus assets for disposal totalling 2.1bln.    Still very comfortable debt level. |
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
oscar10
Member |
25-Aug-2014 11:39
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Besides all these fundamental analysis, is there any other competitor beside Thai tycoon? If not.. Who is willing to buy at high or even higher price? Based on F& N, there are a number of competitors. Here? |
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
25-Aug-2014 11:17
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
UE may not say very much.  UE took over WBL in 2013 and are in the process of realigning businesses.  UE sold Bizpark East, but bought freehold comm properties at 450 and 452 Alexadra (former HP?), they are not desperate for cash, far from it. It is a company that will be reaping profits from their property  portfolio.      Reason why predators are eying it. F& N price appreciation from 6 plus to 9.95 is about $3 per share,  it took about 6mths and was complicated by Heineken taking over Asia Pacific breweries, the takeover was $13plus bln. UE' s would be below $2bln, and there are fewer complications.      Shareholders  who did not accept 8.88 from Charoen eventually  got  additional $1 plus per share when he upped the price to $9.95.   Generally, mkt feels the deal will go through, willing buyer willing seller.        Those who are in, likely sit on  windfall.  Those not in, it' s still cheap below $3. |
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Qanghoo
Supreme |
25-Aug-2014 10:45
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Yes, I think easily > 3/share.  Was hoping for some dip to enter and make abt 10%.  But don' t know what' s next now.
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
25-Aug-2014 10:32
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Net Asset Value is not the only parameter to be considered in arriving  at UE' s fair value.        It is a profitable company, cash of 744mln against a debt of 1bln.    Plus assets  avail for disposal is about  1.5 bln.  Looks very comfortable with liquidity and debt. It would be a surprise if UE is valued at NAV alone, based on the fundamentals, UE is an undervalued company with growth potential, with a low PE way below it' s peers. Not forgetting the teochew has to buy 66% from the market after OCBC agrees to sell (likely above 2.79).        Remember F& N, Charoen offered 8.88 to the public  and later up the price to 9.95 when OUE came in.      Who wouldn' t want to buy a profitable co at a low price?    |
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
kahdeve
Member |
25-Aug-2014 10:22
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
agree!  
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
25-Aug-2014 10:16
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The halt was called by UE, pending an announcement.  OCBC may not be able to agree to  price until they get consultant advice, otherwise shareholders may query why they sell low. As UE is in  a strong position having recently announce , no reason for OCBC to sell below NAV of 2.78, or rather 2.79 as stated in the UE document released on 14th Aug regarding their quarterly results:
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
kahdeve
Member |
25-Aug-2014 09:37
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Samling Said to Near Agreement to Purchase Jaguar Dealer WearnesBy Joyce Koh Aug 25, 2014 8:41 AM GMT+0800
Save
Samling Group, the Malaysian plantation owner and property developer, is nearing a deal to buy the luxury car distributor owned by Singapore&rsquo s United Engineers Ltd. (UEM), people with knowledge of the matter said. United Engineers aims to sign an agreement as early as this week to sell Wearnes Automotive Pte for as much as S$450 million ($360 million), one of the people said, asking not to be identified as the talks are private. The sale includes real estate owned by Wearnes, they said. Samling competed for Wearnes with Hong Kong trading house Swire Pacific Ltd. (19) and Dubai&rsquo s Al-Futtaim Group, which runs retail chains in Singapore including Royal Sporting House, according to people with knowledge of the process. Shares of United Engineers were halted from trading today. Wearnes, founded in 1906, distributes Jaguar and Bentley cars in Singapore and Indonesia, according to its website. It also runs Volvo dealerships in Hong Kong and mainland China. Spokesmen for for the companies declined to comment or didn&rsquo t immediately respond to queries from Bloomberg News. Samling distributes Bentley, Mitsubishi and Honda vehicles in Malaysia, the website shows. United Engineers, whose businesses include real estate and construction, bought Wearnes&rsquo parent company WBL Corp. last year for $725 million including debt, data compiled by Bloomberg show. To contact the reporter on this story: Joyce Koh in Singapore at [email protected] To contact the editors responsible for this story: Philip Lagerkranser at [email protected] Ben Scent |
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
ysh2006
Supreme |
25-Aug-2014 09:00
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Either two thing : 1) Talk fail no RTO 2) RTO sucessful price only $ 2.3x only ? (Thai guy stingy) 3) RTO price $3.xx ..Which one ?..
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
rlong8288
Master |
25-Aug-2014 08:53
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
halt trading
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
23-Aug-2014 06:59
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
What price  should UE be as fair value? Take a look at industry peers: Capitaland (PE: 17.32, Book value per share: $3.6943) CityDev (PE: 16.32, BVPS: 8.6723) Wheelock (PE: 42.35, BVPS: $2.645) Hotel Properties (PE: 15.25, BVPS: $3.3911) UE (PE: 9.9 - based on Fri' s closing price of 2.76 and EPS 0.2785 , BVPS: $2.78)   It is apparent that each company has a different BVPS and the difference is very significant even within peers in similar industry.    To base a takeover price purely on BVPS does not seem to be a balanced way of valueing a company, the PE is equally important.    If we use a range, drawing from peers, a PE of 15.25 to 42.35, UE' s fair valuation price could be $4.1775 to $11.79.       |
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
22-Aug-2014 22:58
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
What' s UE' s TP? Book value per share is 2.78.  CIMB analyst suggested a 20% discount to NAV. After buying the 34% from OCBC and co,Charoen need to mop up another 17% to have a 51% ownership.    So what' s the likelihood the shareholders will sell at 20% below NAV?    List of large shareholders:
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
22-Aug-2014 21:47
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
F & N price chart (unadjusted):
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
22-Aug-2014 21:01
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Events revisited on F& N takeover by Charoen. 5th Jun 2012 Price of F& N: 6.34 (Vol 1.17mln) 20th Jun  Charoen discuss with OCBC to buy over stakes (P: 7.00, vol 1.02mln) 19th Jul OCBC announces sale of F& N and APB to Charoen.  (P:7.6,  vol 1.06mln) 14th Aug (P:8.55, vol 318ml) 19th Oct (P: 9.29, vol 11.5mln) 21st Jan 2013 (P:9.74, Vol 98mln) History is repeating itself, don' t miss this ride!  |
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||
|
Kyoto2008
Elite |
22-Aug-2014 17:02
|
|||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
|
|||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | ||||||



Yahoo
Googlize this
Facebook