| Latest Forum Topics / Courts Asia |
|
|
COURTS ASIA- NAV 44.5 cents . P/E : 10
|
|||||
|
hfjdhy
Member |
04-Mar-2019 10:27
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
So far Nojima only have 86.35%, short of the 90% for mandatory and compulsory acquisitions of the remaining shares . Minority shareholders are holding out...... https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/Voluntary_Unconditional_General_Offer_-_Level_of_Acceptances_of_Offer.ashx?App=Announcement& FileID=546087 |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
fundamentalhero
Veteran |
21-Feb-2019 20:17
Yells: "I NEED HONEYS AND MONIES" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
technically it is not about keeping our shares, if they cannot get 90%, they have to pay listing fees etc. now that they got 70 over %, to save monies since they are already listed overseas, they will want to delist here. Hopefully because of them wanting to save monies, they give a proper or satisfactory offer like 50 cents to 70cents per share. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
YXK1234
Member |
21-Feb-2019 18:11
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Just don' t sell, if Nojima can' t buy up 90% minority shareholders can keep their shares. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
fundamentalhero
Veteran |
18-Feb-2019 23:40
Yells: "I NEED HONEYS AND MONIES" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
nps. the waiting game is not too long from now. lets just try to squeeze the max benefit. | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
bigeater
Member |
17-Feb-2019 19:06
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Thank you so much fundamentalhero.  I guess anyone with deep pocket can do VGO.  Unless the offer price is attractive enough, it just makes themselves and the target company busy and waste money on hiring IFA and comeing out with all these offer documents. Will not accept the offer and hopefully noone will!    | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
fundamentalhero
Veteran |
16-Feb-2019 01:09
Yells: "I NEED HONEYS AND MONIES" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Go to valuebuddies and read. (Courts thread) from what I understand, we can hold and wait for a better delisting price and rah rah to SGX on this UNFAIR  deal and most probably DELISTING OFFER  when this VGO is less than 90%,   and the backup plan is that if this offer pushes above 90% [highly not possible as earlier group of people bought at all time high still loss a sh4t ton of money on this offer less dividends], then no choice have to accept. essentially from what i understand is that until then just wait and play hard to get to squeeze max benefit for the highly possible eventual DO which hopefully will be about 50cents. all in all, SGX ought to be ashamed, from what i read in VB, this is not the first time courts executed this stunt to VGO or DO cheap. wash rinse repeat scam listing which SGX allowed and has till date remained silent. lol essentially impossible to upkeep our exchange integrity and draw (attraction of good listings and monies) which to me is a sign of demise of our country in the near future.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
fundamentalhero
Veteran |
16-Feb-2019 00:59
Yells: "I NEED HONEYS AND MONIES" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/CAL_Offeree_Circular_dated_15_February_2019.ashx?App=Announcement& FileID=543705 12. KPMG&rsquo S ADVICE IN RELATION TO THE OFFER 12.1 Appointment of Independent Financial Adviser KPMG has been appointed as the independent financial adviser to advise the Recommending Directors for the purpose of making a recommendation to the Shareholders in connection with the Offer. Having carefully considered, inter alia, our analysis set out above and the information available to us as at the Latest Practicable Date, and based upon the monetary, industry, market, economic, and other relevant conditions subsisting on the Latest Practicable Date, we are of the opinion that the Offer is not fair but reasonable from a financial point of view. We have considered the following pertinent factors in determining that the Offer is not fair: We have considered the following pertinent factors in determining that the Offer is reasonable: And yet SGX is letting this sh2t transaction happen??!??!?! lol pure joke. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/sgx-needs-more-regulatory-bite-to-improve-oversight?utm_source=emarsys& utm_medium=email& utm_campaign=BT_Breakfast_Brief& utm_term=SGX+needs+more+regulatory+bite+to+improve+oversight& utm_content=31%2F01%2F2019 All these sh*t news and suggestions and yet this stupid suggestion?!?!? |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
bigeater
Member |
15-Feb-2019 15:30
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
What will happen if we do not accept the cash offer? | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
danger
Supreme |
10-Feb-2019 15:16
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
No matter what..courts is going to be delisted soon | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
guards80
Supreme |
09-Feb-2019 19:39
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Courts Asia: Financial Statements and Related Announcement :: Third Quarter Resultshttp://repository.shareinvestor.com/rpt_view.pl/id/767987.1/type/sgxnet/original_filename/1http://repository.shareinvestor.com/rpt_view.pl/id/767987.2/type/sgxnet/original_filename/1 |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
fundamentalhero
Veteran |
04-Feb-2019 10:08
Yells: "I NEED HONEYS AND MONIES" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
huh???? CSR??? show that courts doing good? When share price is deflated and offer price accepted by majority is such a bad price? https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/life-culture/courts-singapore-launches-charity-arm?utm_source=emarsys& utm_medium=email& utm_campaign=BT_Breakfast_Brief& utm_term=Courts+Singapore+launches+charity+arm& utm_content=04%2F02%2F2019 bullshit story and lousy pr attempt |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
Starship
Supreme |
02-Feb-2019 11:35
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
This is the kind of Clown Moves that we witness all too frequently in SGX Circus. Very suspicious indeed............................. Sevak' s controlling shareholder intends to make partial offer for shares of the firm FRI, FEB 01, 2019 - 10:36 PM SEVAK Limited' s controlling shareholder Smart Co Holding said on Friday it intends to make a partial offer for the shares of the company directly or through its concert parties, which will result in Smart Co Holding and its concert parties holding about 51 per cent of the shares of Sevak. Sevak said in a Singapore Exchange (SGX) filing that it was notified by Smart Co Holding of its intention on Friday after the close of trading. It added that Smart Co Holding emphasised there is no assurance any transaction will eventually materialise, and no definitive or binding agreements have been reached in relation to the possible transaction. The announcement came a day after the Singapore Exchange Regulation (SGX RegCo) urged investors and potential investors to exercise caution when trading in the shares of the company. It noted that despite a general decline in the broader market, Sevak' s share price had climbed steadily from S$2.51 on Sept 17, 2018 to S$4.05 on Oct 19, 2018, representing a meteoric rise of S$1.54 or 61 per cent. Of particular suspicion is that between Oct 4, 2018 and Oct 16, 2018, despite the Straits Times Index falling by 233.09 points or 7.13 per cent, Sevak' s share price rose from S$3.30 to S$3.80, an increase of S$0.50 or 15 per cent. Since Sept 17, 2018, Sevak' s market capitalisation has increased by about S$14.8 million to reach S$44.4 million on Jan 25. On Jan 24, Sevak said that it had submitted an application to exit the watch-list.  SGX RegCo said that it is reviewing the trades in Sevak shares and will " take the necessary actions" .  Sevak' s counter shed 28 Singapore cents or 7.43 per cent to close at S$3.49 on Friday. https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/sevaks-controlling-shareholder-intends-to-make-partial-offer-for-shares-of-the |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
Starship
Supreme |
02-Feb-2019 11:24
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The reason why many counters in SGX are famously known as Value Traps  is precisely because they continuously suck in small investors' money while storingh up fats in the company for eventual cheap take-over.    And to fatten up the cow fast, the company distributes pathetic dividends over years and decades while executing rights issues, etc, etc to suck in more money. While small investors wring their hands for years to decades hoping for a final windfall that turns out to be a mirage. Eventually, the  take-over parties (usually the Founder, Chairman, CEO, SS, CS, Director, etc) laugh all the way to the bank while small investors cry to their graves.
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
fundamentalhero
Veteran |
02-Feb-2019 01:34
Yells: "I NEED HONEYS AND MONIES" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
good reference  " https://www.valuebuddies.com/thread-2409-post-151013.html#pid151013"   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
fundamentalhero
Veteran |
02-Feb-2019 01:17
Yells: "I NEED HONEYS AND MONIES" |
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
offer is ridiculous and yet SRG accepted. typed a letter to sgx. this makes no sense, courts did not suffer extensive losses through the listing years that can lead to the acceptance of the offer which is less than half of its share capital on listing. " https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/quote/RE2.SI/financials?p=RE2.SI" ridiculously fishy and funny business going on. neither were ALL profits extensively distributed  " https://www2.sgx.com/securities/stock-screener?page=1& code=RE2" How is it then anyone in their right mind in all transparent and logical thoughts sell something worth " quoting from the offer papers " CAL Share Capital. As at the Latest Practicable Date, based on the latest information available to the Offeror1 , CAL has an issued and fully paid up share capital of S$267.3 million, comprising 517,464,469 Shares with 42,535,531 treasury shares, and has granted certain Awards which will be released and vested in various tranches." at about 47cents / unit at the offer price of less than half of its sharevalue at 20.5 cents / unit despite having profitted in the earlier years after listing and yet not having suffered any significant or adverse losses that may lead to the erosion of share price. SGX should really wake up   |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
danger
Supreme |
25-Jan-2019 16:12
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
ANY HIGHER OFFER FOR COURTS ! COURTS MGMT IS S C REWED UP AND LOUSY BUNCH |
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
edwinjup
Supreme |
23-Jan-2019 14:17
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Bought some cdw.......lol
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
danger
Supreme |
21-Jan-2019 13:10
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
COURTS ASIA any phase 2 rocket ?? | ||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
lukewong82
Master |
19-Jan-2019 12:43
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
no leh, Aztech not making losses but share price also down a lot just before takeover.. and who knows,  losses may not be real " losses" ... a bit of " creative" accounting can make anything looks like loss and then " force" the share price down lo = one of the many  methods of artificially depressing the share price so that takeover can happen cheap.. :)
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
nqing87
Supreme |
19-Jan-2019 12:27
|
||||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
they are making losses.. vard is in the O& G sector and has been making losses.. courts make losses in 2018 also.. share price drop is reflecting this.. but to side track, if u look at many of our IPOs especially the food/bev sector, these companies list when the sentiment towards the industry is good.. so they list at a rather peak price, and often their results subsequently perform below par (eg no signboard).. basically what retailers are facing is scooping up shares that are probably listed at a peak when the company is making peak performance.. im now looking at propnex/apac realty, both of which are listed when property market sentiment become better.. it is likely these 2 will be making strong revenue/profit in 2018 and 2019 especially, but subsequently will perform much weaker after the demand from en bloc sales owners got absorb up.. this is a problem with many IPOs, and we have to identify which one will really make sustainable growth down the years, and not those who list just to get money to repay debts, or list at a point where the company is making peak profits, or list when the sentiment towards that sector is at the peak.. 
|
||||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||

