Latest Forum Topics /
Alpha Integrated RE
Last:0.48
-0.01
|
|
|
Starhub
|
|||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
06-Aug-2024 15:46
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Sabana Reit trustee to propose &lsquo preferred candidates&rsquo for internal manager personnel
It is also in the midst of applying for a capital markets services licence for the new internal manager
 
THE trustee of Sabana Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust (Sabana Reit) has identified and executed letters of intent with &ldquo preferred candidates&rdquo whom it intends to propose as directors and senior management of the Reit&rsquo s new internal manager.
 
This comes as part of HSBC Institutional Trust Services&rsquo update to unitholders of the Reit on Monday (Aug 5), which outlined the latest indicative timeline for internalisation up to December 2024.
 
The updated timeline follows recent court rulings on an application by the trustee to clarify steps for the internalisation process, and a since-dismissed appeal by several ESR entities.
 
As the trustee of Sabana Reit, HSBC Institutional Trust Services said a draft of the new internal manager&rsquo s budget and operating plan has been created and will be presented to the new board of directors and senior management, following their appointments or commencement of employment.
 
It is also in the midst of applying for a capital markets services licence for the new internal manager.
 
Among other administrative matters, work for the licence application includes &ldquo addressing the fit and proper criteria&rdquo for its proposed directors and chief executive of the new internal manager, said the trustee.
 
On Jul 23, the Reit manager reported a distribution per unit of S$0.0134 for the first half of its fiscal year ended Jun 30, down 16.8 per cent from S$0.0161 in the corresponding year-ago period.
 
Total income available for distribution came in at S$16.4 million, 8.2 per cent lower year on year, mainly due to higher finance costs from increased borrowings and higher borrowing costs.
 
The manager estimated total costs of about S$8.9 million incurred by both itself and the trustee from Jan 1, 2024, until Jun 30, 2024, in connection with the Reit&rsquo s internalisation process. 
 
This comprised nearly S$1.9 million in expenses incurred by the manager and another S$7.1 million by the trustee, noted the former in its Jul 23 results presentation.
 
In its latest update to unitholders, HSBC Institutional Trust Services estimated that about 16 per cent or S$1.4 million of total costs had gone to relevant service providers, including for proposals for requisitioned resolutions, and convening additional extraordinary general meetings (EGMs) that were &ldquo not contemplated&rdquo in the trustee&rsquo s work plan.
 
Another 12 per cent or S$1.1 million was in connection to the Order 32 application and ESR&rsquo s appeal due to divergent views among unitholders deemed &ldquo fundamental to the progress of the internalisation as well as the trustee&rsquo s proposed path to internalisation&rdquo .
 
Finally, the trustee noted that about 15 per cent or S$1.4 million of total costs were incurred by both itself and the manager from pre-internalisation activities.
 
This includes but is not limited to legal costs incurred in the process of preparing for Sabana Reit&rsquo s EGM on Aug 7, 2023 &ndash along with logistical costs of convening the event, noted HSBC Institutional Trust Services.
|
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
sangsang1
Senior |
02-Aug-2024 17:22
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
yes, must submit the form via email to  [email protected] latest by 5pm Saturday 3rd Aug 2024 (tomorrow). must vote la, to finally finish internalisation and have more dividend!!! 
|
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|
|||
|
asianguy
Senior |
02-Aug-2024 10:34
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Found out we can email the form to :   
 
|
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
asianguy
Senior |
02-Aug-2024 10:23
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I forget to post the EGM voting form for 6-Aug. I think its too late to post today. Is there an online site where we can submit the form ? thanks | ||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
Alignment
Elite |
02-Aug-2024 09:42
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
For now. The way that response reads it sounds like management expect a changing of the guard once the internalisation happens and it will be up to a new bunch of people to approve any special dividend. | ||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|
|||
|
luckyguy3
Master |
01-Aug-2024 07:47
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
rejected... so no bumper liao
|
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
Alignment
Elite |
01-Aug-2024 02:49
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Not that I want to discourage people from voting, but it' s clear resolution 1 will pass. Perhaps 90%+ in favour. | ||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
sangsang1
Senior |
31-Jul-2024 16:31
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Wah you very huat!  even after ex-dividend, price still holding up Once Reso 1 passed at the EGM, internalization will work and DPU will go up! Have to vote soon, last day Friday... if Resolution do not pass then jialat...same old manager See how ESR bought sponsor asset, then now leverage at 41+%   |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|
|||
|
Alignment
Elite |
28-Jul-2024 02:46
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Happily I bought shares on the basis that ESR' s appeal would fail. Things looking good now with operational side of things strong as well. | ||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
sangsang1
Senior |
28-Jul-2024 00:32
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Very good news, no wonder shares has been on the uptrend.  Also saw that that the committee will now press the manager to fund the internal manager by debt and return the DPU witheld to unitholders.  If successful, will be a bumper end of year dividend. hope they will be able to push this through  |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
27-Jul-2024 13:27
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
High Court dismisses ESR&rsquo s appeal to vote on Sabana Reit&rsquo s proposed trust deed amendment
The Reit will proceed with its extraordinary general meeting on Aug 6
 
THE Singapore High Court has thrown out an appeal by several ESR entities to vote on the proposed trust deed amendments of Sabana Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust (Sabana Reit).
 
It also ordered the entities to pay HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) &ndash the Reit&rsquo s trustee &ndash S$16,119.80 in legal costs, with the remaining costs and expenses to be paid out of the trust.
 
On Friday (Jul 26), the trustee noted that the court would issue reasons for its decision at a later date. It also added that the Reit would proceed with the extraordinary general meeting (EGM) on Aug 6.
 
In a statement seen by The Business Times, Sabana Growth Internalisation Committee (SGIC), set up by unit holders including Quarz Capital, said the ruling &ldquo clarifies and strengthens&rdquo investor protection in Singapore.
 
SGIC also urged all unitholders to vote for the resolutions in favour of the internalisation at the EGM.
 
The committee said: &ldquo The successful internalisation of Sabana Reit will allow all unit holders to own the manager. It will bring about stronger corporate governance, investor protection, higher distribution per unit (DPU) and the revival of the Singapore Reit market.&rdquo
 
The committee also asked Sabana&rsquo s manager and trustee to protect unit holders&rsquo interest by returning costs and DPU withheld to them.
 
It also requested the sponsor and the owner of the trust&rsquo s current manager to protect jobs, uphold corporate practices, as well as waive non-compete agreements and allow the current staff of the external manager to join the new entity.
 
ESR&rsquo s appeal came after the court in May ruled that the trust deed amendments are required to effect the internalisation of Sabana&rsquo s manager, but barred the entities from voting on them.
 
The court ruling arose from an Order 32 application submitted by the trustee in January to clarify steps for the internalisation process.
 
In the application, the trustee sought court declarations that proposed amendments to the trust deed were required to implement internalisation. It also sought a declaration on whether ESR entities ought to be permitted to vote on the amendments.
 
ESR entities were prohibited from voting as the court deemed them to have an interest from fee income the external manager earns.
|
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
sangsang1
Senior |
26-Jul-2024 16:48
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
i think la, not sure, because the Trustee represented Sabana, if it is at fault, then, Sabana is at fault 
|
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|
|||
|
Powdyman
Member |
26-Jul-2024 15:50
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The Business Times
High Court dismisses ESR?s appeal to vote on Sabana Reit?s proposed trust deed amendment The Reit will proceed with its extraordinary general meeting on Aug 6 THE Singapore High Court has thrown out an appeal by several ESR entities to vote on the proposed trust deed amendments of Sabana Industrial Real Estate Investment Trust (Sabana Reit). It also ordered the entities to pay HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) ? the Reit?s trustee ? S$16,119.80 in legal costs, with the remaining costs and expenses to be paid out of the trust. On Friday (Jul 26), the trustee noted that the court would issue reasons for its decision at a later date. It also added that the Reit would proceed with the extraordinary general meeting (EGM) on Aug 6. In a statement seen by The Business Times, Sabana Growth Internalisation Committee (SGIC), set up by unit holders including Quarz Capital, said the ruling ?clarifies and strengthens? investor protection in Singapore. SGIC also urged all unitholders to vote for the resolutions in favour of the internalisation at the EGM. The committee said: ?The successful internalisation of Sabana Reit will allow all unit holders to own the manager. It will bring about stronger corporate governance, investor protection, higher distribution per unit (DPU) and the revival of the Singapore Reit market.? |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
Alignment
Elite |
26-Jul-2024 11:06
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I don' t think so, but I could be wrong. People normally pay for their own costs in court unless someone is clearly at fault. In none of the court disputes was Sabana REIT itself at fault so I would not expect it to take up the costs of the other parties. | ||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
sangsang1
Senior |
25-Jul-2024 21:34
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
maybe because Trustee got the who can vote thing wrong? and Court rule ESR cannot vote?  | ||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
Alignment
Elite |
25-Jul-2024 02:49
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
A bit surprised ESR and Quarz legal costs to be paid by the REIT. | ||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
Joelton
Supreme |
24-Jul-2024 14:59
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Internalisation costs rise to $8.9 million for Sabana REIT, DPU falls 16.8% y-o-y
 
Sabana Industrial REIT&rsquo s 1HFY2024 results for the six months to June 30 had some good news, and some bad news.
 
First the bad news. Financing costs rose to 4.3% in 1HFY2024, from 3.89% h-o-h and y-o-y. In June, Sabana REIT&rsquo s manager refinanced a $93 million syndicated bank loan with a $100 million 4.15% bond that matures in 2029.
 
Lim Wei Huang, CFO at Sabana REIT&rsquo s manager says: &ldquo The $93 million loan was under a syndication arrangement. This is part of proactive capital management. The market was conducive."  
 
Lim was referring to the $100 million loan being guaranteed by Credit Guarantee and Investment Facility (CGIF) a unit of the Asian Development Bank. He adds that the REIT manager had been in conversations with CGIF since 2022.
 
&ldquo For the refinancing, the REIT is facing operational challenges in even obtaining hedging with the banks and this option is not available to the REIT. We are seeking their waiver for the internalisation and they are still assessing it,&rdquo Lim says. &ldquo I won&rsquo t say conventional financing is not there. But there are operational hurdles we are facing with our current lenders.&rdquo
 
Donald Han, CEO of Sabana REIT&rsquo s manager adds: &ldquo We did not get our general mandate in the last AGM and that reduces the additional lever to look into various ways to reduce our financing. The situation is different for us than for other REITs. And, since 7 August, 2023, the internalisation process has cost us $8.92 million.&rdquo
 
In the application to the High Court of Singapore in HC/OA 19/2024 (Order 32 Application), the Court ordered that Quarz&rsquo s and the ESR Entities&rsquo costs of the proceedings be paid out of Sabana REIT, save that Quarz may only claim 70% of its costs out of the REIT. With respect to HC/AD 37/2024 (AD 37 Appeal), the Appellate Division of the High Court has not yet determined whether parties&rsquo costs should be paid out of the REIT. The quantum of costs in both the Order 32 Application and AD 37 Appeal remains undetermined at this juncture.
 
No surprise then, that, as a result of higher finance costs due to increased borrowings and higher borrowing costs, total income available for distribution fell 6.6% y-o-y to $16.6 million. Income available for distribution per unit was 8.7% lower y-o-y at 1.47 cents due to the enlarged unit base on the back of the distribution reinvestment plan. With the retention of approximately 10% of distributable income which will be deployed to fund costs incurred in connection with the internalisation, distribution amount declared per unit decreased by 16.8% y-o-y to 1.34 cents for 1H2024, compared to 1.61 cents in 1H2023.
 
Now for the good news. Sabana REIT suffered two master lease terminations and repossessed 33 & 35 Penjuru Lane and 30 & 32 Tuas Avenue 8. Nonetheless, Han points out that his leasing efforts have produced good results, with about 42% of the total lettable area at 33 & 35 Penjuru Lane leased out and a one-month booking fee received for around 27% of total lettable area.
 
&ldquo We have also quickly arranged for a number of prospective tenants to view 30 & 32 Tuas Avenue 8,&rdquo he adds.
 
In the meantime, Sabana@1TA4 has obtained its TOP on July 9. Lease documentation is underway with a prospective tenant for the annex block, which accounts for about 64% of the property&rsquo s total lettable area.
 
Elsewhere, the seven-year commercial zoning for NTP+, a mall carved out of New Tech Park, is due to expire in late 2026. &ldquo There is a clause in URA that allows us to extend and we can approach the authorities for the extension. We are able to onboard tenants like Kopi & Tarts. There is a lot in the value proposition for us to maintain this as commercial zoning. It helps to support existing tenants, schools and residents. It&rsquo s a matter of procedure to get an extension by working closely with the stakeholders of NTP+&rdquo Han says.  
 
|
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
Alignment
Elite |
24-Jul-2024 11:56
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Decent results. Leasing activity not affected by the corporate events. | ||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
Powdyman
Member |
24-Jul-2024 09:33
|
||
|
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The Trustee notes that the Manager has reported a year-on-year decline in Sabana Industrial REIT?s
declared distribution per unit (?DPU?) for 1H 2024 by 16.8%. As disclosed by the Manager, the income available for distribution per unit was reduced mainly due to the increased financing costs on the back of higher borrowings and borrowing costs, as well as an enlarged unit base following the distribution reinvestment plan. The declared DPU was impacted by the Manager?s retention of approximately 10% of the total income available for distribution for prudent capital management in view of the costs incurred and to be incurred in connection with the internalisation. Conveniently forgotten about the 10% retention of the total income by the reit Manager. Vote to remove them. |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
sangsang1
Senior |
23-Jul-2024 21:36
|
||
|
x 1
x 0 Alert Admin |
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/opinion-features/singapore-reit-sector-will-do-better-internally-managed-reits
Singapore Reit sector will do better with internally managed ReitsWE REFER to the article &lsquo Reit unitholders should not assume that an internal manager will automatically leave them better off&rsquo (BT, Jul 16) and would like to point to the substantial merits of internal managers for Reits. The facts are, as elaborated in an Ernst & Young paper, the debate on the merits of internal versus external management structure has already long been resolved in favour of the internal model. This is why in older and larger Reit markets such as the United States and Australia, the overwhelming majority of Reits there are internally managed. Academic research has shown that internally managed Reits perform better. As early as in 1995, research showed that US internally managed Reits outperformed externally managed Reits by more than 7 per cent from 1985 to 1992. A study comparing the risk-adjusted performance of Australian Reits found that internally managed Reits also outperformed. Internally managed NetLink Trust and Croesus Retail Trust have also substantially outperformed their Singapore externally managed peers. Beside Reits sponsored by GLCs such as Mapletree, CapitaLand and Keppel which have shown superior corporate governance and strong commitment to investors&rsquo protection, Reits investors have generally regarded the track records of the other sponsors as mixed and far from satisfactory.   While sponsors can provide a property pipeline, research has repeatedly shown that in many cases, Reits pay more for properties acquired from their sponsors than for assets acquired from third parties. Research also suggests that externally managed Reits are sometimes merely divestment vehicles for sponsors&rsquo illiquid investment grade real estate which enables sponsors to recycle capital efficiently. The review of Eagle Hospitality Trust uncovered that the external manager had not ensured that its sponsor provided security deposits on its master lease and did not prevent the sponsor from channelling loans to itself. Both FT and Bloomberg have raised concerns at externally managed Digital Core Reit, which was spun out of the sponsor and listed on SGX in 2021. When Cyxtera filed for bankruptcy, it accounted for only 1.7 per cent of the sponsor&rsquo s revenue but more than 20 per cent of Digital Core Reit&rsquo s rental revenue.   The claims of higher financing costs is also unfounded. ESR Logos Reit &ndash five times bigger than Sabana &ndash reported cost of debt of 4.1 per cent. Sabana recently issued a 4.15 per cent bond post-vote to remove the external manager. Astute financiers rightly prioritise more important factors such as the property portfolio. Under an internal manager model, all Sabana unitholders will own the internal manager which will only serve and work in the interests of unitholders.  All unitholders will also have the right to vote in and remove directors. This increased corporate governance and rights will result in stronger accountability and unitholders&rsquo protection. The profit earned by the external manager will be re-channelled back to unitholders resulting in higher distribution per unit (DPU). While the internalisation has taken a longer time and higher cost, the trustee could have speeded up the process by five months if it had sought clarifications from the court right after the vote. With clearer precedence, the process will be substantially faster and cheaper. Sabana&rsquo s internalisation also developed from the failed merger to ESR Logo Reit in 2020 which if accepted, would have resulted in Sabana&rsquo s unit price to be at a significantly lower level.   Removing the manager and internalisation is the Monetary Authority of Singapore&rsquo s fundamental key pillar of unitholders&rsquo protection. Without this protection, external managers will be fully entrenched &ndash they can &ldquo do whatever they want&rdquo without any accountability. There would be a huge loss of confidence in the Singapore financial markets as investors essentially have zero recourse. The majority of current Reit unitholders currently have zero rights to appoint or remove any directors of their external managers. Since 2014, Japan has accelerated key reforms to increase corporate governance and shareholder rights. This has successfully attracted investors and driven the equity market to a new high. The South Korean regulator and stock exchange have also initiated their Corporate Value-Up programme to reform and limit the rights of entrenched shareholder groups to attract investors. As such, it is important that all Sabana unitholders vote for all the resolutions at the upcoming Aug 6 EGM which are for the internalisation. The successful internalisation at Sabana Reit will set a positive precedence and bring about stronger corporate governance, investors&rsquo protection and the revival of the S-Reit market. |
||
| Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||


